| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The URL Shortify WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk-deleting links or groups, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary link and group via a CSRF attack. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Employee Leave Management System v.2.1 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the manage-employee.php component |
| A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A CSRF vulnerability in the gestione_utenti.php endpoint of HotelDruid 3.0.7 allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions (e.g., modifying user passwords) on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting the lack of origin or referrer validation and the absence of CSRF tokens. NOTE: this is disputed because there is an id_sessione CSRF token. |
| Path Traversal vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Grill and Chow allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects Grill and Chow: from n/a through 1.6. |
| Path Traversal vulnerability in Mikado-Themes GrandPrix allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects GrandPrix: from n/a through 1.6. |
| Path Traversal vulnerability in Mikado-Themes MediClinic allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects MediClinic: from n/a through 2.1. |
| Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session. |
| The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the WP Login URL via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including donation addresses and display configurations, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Recooty – Job Widget (Old Dashboard) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the recooty_save_maybe() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the recooty_key option and inject malicious content into iframe src attributes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary email addresses to the spam allowlist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 2026.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Bard bardwp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bard: from n/a through <= 1.6. |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Wanderland wanderland allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Wanderland: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Angel Costa WP SEO Search wp-seo-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP SEO Search: from n/a through <= 1.1. |
| Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. From versions 2.0.0 to before 2.3.2, the public endpoint /api/user/[username] returns user email addresses in its JSON response. The fix, intended for release in 2.3.1 but only available starting in version 2.3.2, removes email addresses from public API responses while keeping the endpoint publicly accessible. Users should upgrade to version 2.3.2 or later to eliminate exposure. There are no workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings. |
| A flaw was found in rsync. When using the `--safe-links` option, the rsync client fails to properly verify if a symbolic link destination sent from the server contains another symbolic link within it. This results in a path traversal vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary file write outside the desired directory. |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in rsync. It stems from behavior enabled by the `--inc-recursive` option, a default-enabled option for many client options and can be enabled by the server even if not explicitly enabled by the client. When using the `--inc-recursive` option, a lack of proper symlink verification coupled with deduplication checks occurring on a per-file-list basis could allow a server to write files outside of the client's intended destination directory. A malicious server could write malicious files to arbitrary locations named after valid directories/paths on the client. |
