Export limit exceeded: 346616 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (346616 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41354 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 3.7 Low |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an insufficient scope vulnerability in Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys that allows legitimate events from different conversations or senders to collide. Attackers can exploit weak deduplication scoping to cause silent message suppression and disrupt bot workflows across chat sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41357 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 3.3 Low |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an environment variable leakage vulnerability in SSH-based sandbox backends that pass unsanitized process.env to child processes. Attackers can exploit this by leveraging non-default SSH environment forwarding configurations to leak sensitive environment variables from parent processes to SSH child processes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41360 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an approval integrity vulnerability in pnpm dlx that fails to bind local script operands consistently with pnpm exec flows. Attackers can replace approved local scripts before execution without invalidating the approval plan, allowing execution of modified script contents. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41361 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an SSRF guard bypass vulnerability that fails to block four IPv6 special-use ranges. Attackers can exploit this by crafting URLs targeting internal or non-routable IPv6 addresses to bypass SSRF protections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41336 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.8 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 allows workspace .env files to override the OPENCLAW_BUNDLED_HOOKS_DIR environment variable, enabling loading of attacker-controlled hook code. Attackers can replace trusted default-on bundled hooks from untrusted workspaces to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40305 | 1 Dnnsoftware | 2 Dnn Platform, Dotnetnuke | 2026-04-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Starting in version 6.0.0 and prior to version 10.2.2, in the friends feature, a user could craft a request that would force the acceptance of a friend request on another user. Version 10.2.2 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35064 | 2026-04-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s management ecosystem allows unauthenticated discovery of deployed units through the vendor’s management protocol, enabling identification of device presence, identifiers, and management interfaces without requiring credentials. Because discovery functions are exposed by the underlying service rather than gated by authentication, an attacker on the same network segment can rapidly enumerate targeted devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35503 | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows authentication logic to be performed entirely on the client side, relying on hardcoded values within browser-executed scripts rather than server-side verification. An attacker with access to the login page could retrieve these exposed parameters and gain unauthorized access to administrative functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40620 | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s embedded management service allows full administrative control to be established without any form of authentication or authorization on the SenseLive config application. The service accepts management connections from any reachable host, enabling unrestricted modification of critical configuration parameters, operational modes, and device state through a vendor-supplied or compatible client. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40630 | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows unauthorized access to certain configuration endpoints due to improper access control enforcement. An attacker with network access to the device may be able to bypass the intended authentication mechanism and directly interact with sensitive configuration functions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25720 | 2026-04-24 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface due to improper session lifetime enforcement, allowing authenticated sessions to remain active for extended periods without requiring re-authentication. An attacker with access to a previously authenticated session could continue interacting with administrative functions long after legitimate user activity has ceased. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25775 | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s remote management service allows firmware retrieval and update operations to be performed without authentication or authorization. The service accepts firmware-related requests from any reachable host and does not verify user privileges, integrity of uploaded images, or the authenticity of provided firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27843 | 2026-04-24 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050's web management interface that allows critical configuration parameters to be modified without sufficient authentication or server-side validation. By applying unsupported or disruptive values to recovery mechanisms and network settings, an attacker can induce a persistent lockout state. Because the device lacks a physical reset button, recovery requires specialized technical access via the console to perform a factory reset, resulting in a total denial-of-service for the gateway and its connected RS-485 downstream systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6732 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Openshift | 2026-04-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libxml2. This vulnerability occurs when the library processes a specially crafted XML Schema Definition (XSD) validated document that includes an internal entity reference. An attacker could exploit this by providing a malicious document, leading to a type confusion error that causes the application to crash. This results in a denial of service (DoS), making the affected system or application unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4313 | 2026-04-24 | N/A | ||
| AdaptiveGRC is vulnerable to Stored XSS via text type fields across the forms. Authenticated attacker can replace the value of the text field in the HTTP POST request. Improper parameter validation by the server results in arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser. Critically, this may allow the attacker to obtain the administrator authentication token and perform arbitrary actions with administrative privileges, which could lead to further compromise. This issue occurs in versions released before December 2025. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21515 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Iot Central | 2026-04-24 | 9.9 Critical |
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Azure IOT Central allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1951 | 1 Deltaww | 1 As320t | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| Delta Electronics AS320T has no checking of the length of the buffer with the directory name vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25660 | 2026-04-24 | N/A | ||
| CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. Authentication bypass occurs when the URL ends with Authentication with certain function calls. This bypass allows assigning arbitrary permission to any user existing in CodeChecker. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.27.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6272 | 2026-04-24 | N/A | ||
| A client holding only a read JWT scope can still register itself as a signal provider through the production kuksa.val.v2 OpenProviderStream API by sending ProvideSignalRequest. 1. Obtain any valid token with only read scope. 2. Connect to the normal production gRPC API (kuksa.val.v2). 3. Open OpenProviderStream. 4. Send ProvideSignalRequest for a target signal ID. 5. Wait for the broker to forward GetProviderValueRequest. 6. Reply with attacker-controlled GetProviderValueResponse. 7. Other clients performing GetValue / GetValues for that signal receive forged data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21728 | 2026-04-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| Tempo queries with large limits can cause large memory allocations which can impact the availability of the service, depending on its deployment strategy. Mitigation can be done by setting max_result_limit in the search config, e.g. to 262144 (2^18). | ||||