Export limit exceeded: 336937 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9570 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-36622 | 1 Bienlein Project | 1 Bienlein | 2025-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in sah-comp bienlein and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is d7836a4f2b241e4745ede194f0f6fb47199cab6b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216473 was assigned to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36623 | 1 Pengu Project | 1 Pengu | 2025-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Pengu. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function runApp of the file src/index.js. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The name of the patch is aea66f12b8cdfc3c8c50ad6a9c89d8307e9d0a91. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216475. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3035 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2025-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| By first using the AI chatbot in one tab and later activating it in another tab, the document title of the previous tab would leak into the chat prompt. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 137. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11071 | 2025-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4124 | 1 Popup Manager Project | 1 Popup Manager | 2025-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Popup Manager WordPress plugin through 1.6.6 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when deleting popups, which could allow unauthenticated users to delete them | ||||
| CVE-2024-54357 | 1 Theme-fusion | 1 Avada | 2025-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeFusion Avada.This issue affects Avada: from n/a through 7.11.10. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4268 | 1 Phpredisadmin Project | 1 Phpredisadmin | 2025-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in phpRedisAdmin up to 1.17.3. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.18.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is b9039adbb264c81333328faa9575ecf8e0d2be94. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216471. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4275 | 1 Pyambic-pentameter Project | 1 Pyambic-pentameter | 2025-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-28191 | 1 Togglz | 1 Togglz | 2025-04-14 | 8.8 High |
| The console in Togglz before 2.9.4 allows CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2429 | 1 Salonbookingsystem | 1 Salon Booking System | 2025-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Salon booking system WordPress plugin through 9.6.5 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-31859 | 2025-04-14 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Feedbucket Feedbucket – Website Feedback Tool allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Feedbucket – Website Feedback Tool: from n/a through 1.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1203 | 1 Syndeocms | 1 Syndeocms | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in starnet/index.php in SyndeoCMS 3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add user accounts via a save_user action. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5999 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dir-816l, Dir-816l Firmware | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the D-Link DIR-816L Wireless Router with firmware before 2.06.B09_BETA allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the admin password, (2) change the network policy, or (3) possibly have other unspecified impact via crafted requests to hedwig.cgi and pigwidgeon.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2015-2701 | 1 Cs-cart | 1 Cs-cart | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CS-Cart 4.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change a user password via a request to profiles-update/. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1840 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Rubyonrails | 4 Fedora, Opensuse, Jquery-rails and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| jquery_ujs.js in jquery-rails before 3.1.3 and 4.x before 4.0.4 and rails.js in jquery-ujs before 1.0.4, as used with Ruby on Rails 3.x and 4.x, allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy, and trigger transmission of a CSRF token to a different-domain web server, via a leading space character in a URL within an attribute value. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5351 | 4 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests, which allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism by using a token. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5397 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that upload code via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5534 | 1 Oxwall | 1 Oxwall | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Oxwall before 1.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) put the website under maintenance via the maintenance_enable parameter or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the maintenance_text parameter to admin/pages/maintenance. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7376 | 1 Openx | 1 Openx | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in OpenX 2.8.10, possibly before revision 82710, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators, as demonstrated by requests that conduct directory traversal attacks via the group parameter to (1) plugin-preferences.php or (2) plugin-settings.php in www/admin, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3514. | ||||
| CVE-2014-5333 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 8 Adobe Air, Adobe Air Sdk, Flash Player and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.241 and 14.x before 14.0.0.176 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.400 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 14.0.0.178 on Windows and OS X and before 14.0.0.179 on Android, Adobe AIR SDK before 14.0.0.178, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 14.0.0.178 do not properly restrict the SWF file format, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks against JSONP endpoints, and obtain sensitive information, via a crafted OBJECT element with SWF content satisfying the character-set requirements of a callback API, in conjunction with a manipulation involving a '$' (dollar sign) or '(' (open parenthesis) character. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-4671. | ||||