| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Insufficient UI warning of dangerous operations in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Azure Stack allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to change a user's password or create users via '/setup_login?sid=', affecting the 'username', 'password', and 'cpassword' parameters. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete commands individually via '/delete_command?sid=', using the 'cid' parameter. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to rename commands via '/rename_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is present on all functions in edu Business Solutions Print Shop Pro WebDesk version 18.34 (fixed in 19.76). The application does not implement proper CSRF tokens or other other protective measures, allowing a remote attacker to trick authenticated users into unknowingly executing unintended actions within their session. This can lead to unauthorized data modification such as credential updates. |
| A
vulnerability in Brocade Fabric OS before 9.2.1c2 could allow an
authenticated attacker with admin privileges using the shell commands
“source, ping6, sleep, disown, wait to modify the path variables and
move upwards in the directory structure or to traverse to different
directories. |
| A vulnerability in Brocade Fabric OS before 9.2.1 could allow an authenticated attacker with admin privileges using the shell command “grep” to modify the path variables and move upwards in the directory structure or to traverse to different directories. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Acquia Content Hub allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Acquia Content Hub: from 0.0.0 before 3.6.4, from 3.7.0 before 3.7.3. |
| The application is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. An attacker can trick a valid, logged in user into submitting a web request that they did not intend. The request uses the victim's browser's saved authorization to execute the request. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Exeebit phpinfo() WP plugin <= 4.0 versions. |
| PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage. |
| Lime Survey <= 6.5.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The YII_CSRF_TOKEN is only checked when passed in the body of POST requests, but the same check isn't performed in the equivalent GET requests. |
| The HTML Forms WordPress plugin before 1.3.34 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks |
| The URL Shortify WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk-deleting links or groups, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary link and group via a CSRF attack. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A CSRF vulnerability in the gestione_utenti.php endpoint of HotelDruid 3.0.7 allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions (e.g., modifying user passwords) on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting the lack of origin or referrer validation and the absence of CSRF tokens. NOTE: this is disputed because there is an id_sessione CSRF token. |
| Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. From versions 2.0.0 to before 2.3.2, the public endpoint /api/user/[username] returns user email addresses in its JSON response. The fix, intended for release in 2.3.1 but only available starting in version 2.3.2, removes email addresses from public API responses while keeping the endpoint publicly accessible. Users should upgrade to version 2.3.2 or later to eliminate exposure. There are no workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
