Search Results (26 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2009-3567 1 Kayako 2 Esupport, Supportsuite 2025-04-09 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in modules/tickets/functions_ticketsui.php in Kayako SupportSuite and eSupport 3.60.04 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors in the staff control panel, a different vector than CVE-2007-1145.
CVE-2007-1145 1 Kayako 1 Esupport 2025-04-09 N/A
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Kayako SupportSuite - ESupport 3.00.13 and 3.04.10 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to a (1) lostpassword or (2) register action in index.php, (3) unspecified vectors in the Submit form in a submit action in index.php, and (4) the user's name in index.php; and (5) allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the Admin and Staff Control Panel. NOTE: this might issue overlap CVE-2004-1412, CVE-2005-0487, or CVE-2005-0842.
CVE-2008-3701 1 Kayako 1 Supportsuite 2025-04-09 N/A
SQL injection vulnerability in staff/index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.20.02 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the customfieldlinkid parameter in a delcflink action.
CVE-2007-2562 1 Kayako 1 Esupport 2025-04-09 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 3.00.90 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the _m parameter.
CVE-2008-0395 1 Kayako 1 Supportsuite 2025-04-09 N/A
Kayako SupportSuite 3.11.01 allows remote attackers to obtain server configuration information via a direct request to syncml/index.php, which prints the contents of the $_SERVER superglobal.
CVE-2022-35913 1 Kayako 1 Samourai 2024-11-21 4.3 Medium
Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.)