| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In onCreate of MediaProjectionPermissionActivity.java , there is a possible way to grant a malicious app a token enabling unauthorized screen recording capabilities due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In bta_av_config_ind of bta_av_aact.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In onCreate of UninstallerActivity.java, there is a possible way to uninstall a different user's app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme issue in "Yahoo! Shopping" App for Android versions prior to 14.15.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker may lead a user to access an arbitrary website on the vulnerable App. As a result, the user may become a victim of a phishing attack. |
| Improper verification of intent by SamsungExceptionalBroadcastReceiver in S Assistant prior to version 9.3.2 allows local attackers to modify itinerary information. |
| Improper verification of intent by SystemExceptionalBroadcastReceiver in S Assistant prior to version 9.3.2 allows local attackers to modify itinerary information. |
| Improper verification of intent by ExternalBroadcastReceiver in S Assistant prior to version 9.3.2 allows local attackers to modify itinerary information. |
| Denial of service |
| In ReadTachyonCommands of gxp_main_actor.cc, there is a possible information leak due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In TBD of TBD, there is a possible DoS due to a missing null check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| Information disclosure |
| Information disclosure |
| In showAvatarPicker of EditUserPhotoController.java, there is a possible cross user image leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In generateFileInfo of BluetoothOppSendFileInfo.java, there is a possible cross user media disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In contentDescForNotification of NotificationContentDescription.kt, there is a possible notification content leak through the lockscreen due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In ParseTag of dng_ifd.cpp, there is a possible way to crash the image renderer due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible method for a malicious app to prevent dialing emergency services under limited circumstances due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service until the phone reboots with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In isInSignificantPlace of multiple files, there is a possible way to access sensitive information due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Downloads in Google Chrome on Android prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
