Search Results (43617 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2022-32502 1 Nuki 1 Nuki Smart Lock 2026-04-15 6.3 Medium
An issue was discovered on certain Nuki Home Solutions devices. There is a buffer overflow over the encrypted token parsing logic in the HTTP service that allows remote code execution. This affects Nuki Bridge v1 before 1.22.0 and v2 before 2.13.2.
CVE-2024-39008 2 Redhat, Robinweser 2 Rhdh, Fast-loops 2026-04-15 10 Critical
robinweser fast-loops v1.1.3 was discovered to contain a prototype pollution via the function objectMergeDeep. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting arbitrary properties.
CVE-2024-36580 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
A Prototype Pollution issue in cdr0 sg 1.0.10 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2024-42484 1 Espressif 1 Esp-now 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
ESP-NOW Component provides a connectionless Wi-Fi communication protocol. An Out-of-Bound (OOB) vulnerability was discovered in the implementation of the ESP-NOW group type message because there is no check for the addrs_num field of the group type message. This can result in memory corruption related attacks. Normally there are two fields in the group information that need to be checked, i.e., the addrs_num field and the addrs_list fileld. Since we only checked the addrs_list field, an attacker can send a group type message with an invalid addrs_num field, which will cause the message handled by the firmware to be much larger than the current buffer, thus causing a memory corruption issue that goes beyond the payload length.
CVE-2024-39207 2026-04-15 8.2 High
lua-shmem v1.0-1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the shmem_write function.
CVE-2024-39016 1 Che3vinci 1 Utils 2026-04-15 8.1 High
che3vinci c3/utils-1 1.0.131 was discovered to contain a prototype pollution via the function assign. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting arbitrary properties.
CVE-2024-39018 1 Harvey-woo 1 Key-serializer 2026-04-15 6.3 Medium
harvey-woo cat5th/key-serializer v0.2.5 was discovered to contain a prototype pollution via the function "query". This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting arbitrary properties.
CVE-2024-40765 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
An Integer-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicOS via IPSec allows a remote attacker in specific conditions to cause Denial of Service (DoS) and potentially execute arbitrary code by sending a specially crafted IKEv2 payload.
CVE-2024-3911 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
An unauthenticated remote attacker can deceive users into performing unintended actions due to improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames. 
CVE-2017-20205 1 Valvesoftware 2 Source, Source Sdk 2026-04-15 N/A
Valve's Source SDK (source-sdk-2013)'s ragdoll model parsing logic contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability.The tokenizer function `nexttoken` copies characters from an input string into a fixed-size stack buffer without performing bounds checks. When `ParseKeyValue` processes a collisionpair rule longer than the destination buffer (256 bytes), an overflow of the stack buffer `szToken` can occur and overwrite the function return address. A remote attacker can trigger the vulnerable code by supplying a specially crafted ragdoll model which causes the oversized collisionpair rule to be parsed, resulting in remote code execution on affected clients or servers. Valve has addressed this issue in many of their Source games, but independently-developed games must manually apply patch.
CVE-2025-68130 1 Trpc 1 Trpc 2026-04-15 N/A
tRPC allows users to build and consume fully typesafe APIs without schemas or code generation. Starting in version 10.27.0 and prior to versions 10.45.3 and 11.8.0, a A prototype pollution vulnerability exists in `@trpc/server`'s `formDataToObject` function, which is used by the Next.js App Router adapter. An attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` by submitting specially crafted FormData field names, potentially leading to authorization bypass, denial of service, or other security impacts. Note that this vulnerability is only present when using `experimental_caller` / `experimental_nextAppDirCaller`. Versions 10.45.3 and 11.8.0 fix the issue.
CVE-2019-25319 1 Internet-soft 1 Domain Quester Pro 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
Domain Quester Pro 6.02 contains a stack overflow vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by overwriting Structured Exception Handler (SEH) registers. Attackers can craft a malicious payload targeting the 'Domain Name Keywords' input field to trigger an access violation and execute a bind shell on port 9999.
CVE-2019-25365 1 Chaospro 1 Chaospro 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
ChaosPro 2.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the configuration file path handling that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by overwriting the Structured Exception Handler. Attackers can craft a malicious configuration file with carefully constructed payload to overwrite memory and gain remote code execution on vulnerable Windows XP systems.
CVE-2019-25361 1 Ayukov 1 Ayukov Nftp Client 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
Ayukov NFTP client 1.71 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the SYST command handling that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. Attackers can send a specially crafted SYST command with oversized payload to trigger a buffer overflow and execute a bind shell on port 5150.
CVE-2019-25358 1 Nikkhokkho 1 Fileoptimizer 2026-04-15 7.5 High
FileOptimizer 14.00.2524 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by manipulating the FileOptimizer32.ini configuration file. Attackers can overwrite the TempDirectory parameter with a 5000-character buffer to cause the application to crash when opening options.
CVE-2025-30742 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
httpd.c in atophttpd 2.8.0 has an off-by-one error and resultant out-of-bounds read because a certain 1024-character req string would not have a final '\0' character.
CVE-2024-5535 2 Openssl, Redhat 7 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 4 more 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
CVE-2025-68113 1 Altcha 1 Altcha 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
ALTCHA is privacy-first software for captcha and bot protection. A cryptographic semantic binding flaw in ALTCHA libraries allows challenge payload splicing, which may enable replay attacks. The HMAC signature does not unambiguously bind challenge parameters to the nonce, allowing an attacker to reinterpret a valid proof-of-work submission with a modified expiration value. This may allow previously solved challenges to be reused beyond their intended lifetime, depending on server-side replay handling and deployment assumptions. The vulnerability primarily impacts abuse-prevention mechanisms such as rate limiting and bot mitigation. It does not directly affect data confidentiality or integrity. This issue has been addressed by enforcing explicit semantic separation between challenge parameters and the nonce during HMAC computation. Users are advised to upgrade to patched versions, which include version 1.0.0 of the altcha Golang package, version 1.0.0 of the altcha Rubygem, version 1.0.0 of the altcha pip package, version 1.0.0 of the altcha Erlang package, version 1.4.1 of the altcha-lib npm package, version 1.3.1 of the altcha-org/altcha Composer package, and version 1.3.0 of the org.altcha:altcha Maven package. As a mitigation, implementations may append a delimiter to the end of the `salt` value prior to HMAC computation (for example, `<salt>?expires=<time>&`). This prevents ambiguity between parameters and the nonce and is backward-compatible with existing implementations, as the delimiter is treated as a standard URL parameter separator.
CVE-2019-25339 1 Ghia-camip 1 Ghia Camip 2026-04-15 7.5 High
GHIA CamIP 1.2 for iOS contains a denial of service vulnerability in the password input field that allows attackers to crash the application. Attackers can paste a 33-character buffer of repeated characters into the password field to trigger an application crash on iOS devices.
CVE-2025-40769 1 Siemens 1 Sinec Traffic Analyzer 2026-04-15 7.4 High
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Traffic Analyzer (6GK8822-1BG01-0BA0) (All versions < V3.0). The affected application uses a Content Security Policy that allows unsafe script execution methods. This could allow an attacker to execute unauthorized scripts, potentially leading to cross-site scripting attacks.