Export limit exceeded: 344777 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 344777 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (344777 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-8259 | 1 Vaelsys | 1 Vaelsys | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in Vaelsys VaelsysV4 up to 5.1.0/5.4.0. Affected by this issue is the function execute_DataObjectProc of the file /grid/vgrid_server.php of the component Web interface. Such manipulation of the argument xajaxargs leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. Upgrading to version 5.1.1 and 5.4.1 can resolve this issue. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28390 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service. When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing. Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28389 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyAgreeRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service. When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyAgreeRecipientInfo is processed, the optional parameters field of KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing. Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4369 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload in an assembly variant name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4345 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a design name and exported to CSV, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4344 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Fusion | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTML payload in a component name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8095 | 1 Progress Software Corporation | 1 Openedge | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The OECH1 prefix encoding is intended to obfuscate values across the OpenEdge platform. It has been identified as cryptographically weak and unsuitable for stored encodings and enterprise applications. OECH1 encodings should be considered exploitable and immediately replaced by any other supported prefix encoding, all of which are based on symmetric encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2332 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| In Eclipse Jetty, the HTTP/1.1 parser is vulnerable to request smuggling when chunk extensions are used, similar to the "funky chunks" techniques outlined here: * https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html * https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html Jetty terminates chunk extension parsing at \r\n inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error. POST / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost Transfer-Encoding: chunked 1;ext="val X 0 GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1 ... Note how the chunk extension does not close the double quotes, and it is able to inject a smuggled request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27674 | 1 Sap | 1 Sap Netweaver Application Server Java | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| Due to a Code Injection vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Web Dynpro Java), an unauthenticated attacker could supply crafted input that is interpreted by the application and causes it to reference attacker-controlled content. If a victim accesses the affected functionality, that attacker-controlled content could be executed in the victim�s browser, potentially resulting in session compromise. This could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary client-side code, impacting the confidentiality and integrity of the application, with no impact to availability. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0238 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Excel, Excel Viewer, Office and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Excel 2000 SP3, 2002 SP3, 2003 SP3, and 2007 SP1; Excel Viewer 2003 Gold and SP3; Excel Viewer; Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1; and Excel in Microsoft Office 2004 and 2008 for Mac allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Excel document that triggers an access attempt on an invalid object, as exploited in the wild in February 2009 by Trojan.Mdropper.AC. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25741 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Prior to commit bf28c82dc9b1f630fa8e9106358771b20a0040f7, the API endpoint for creating a card update session during an upgrade flow was accessible to users with only organization member privileges. When the associated Stripe Checkout session is completed, the Stripe webhook updates the organization’s default payment method. Because no billing-specific authorization check is enforced, a regular (non-billing) member can change the organization’s payment method. This vulnerability affected the Zulip Cloud payment processing system, and has been patched as of commit bf28c82dc9b1f630fa8e9106358771b20a0040f7. Self-hosted deploys are no longer affected and no patch or upgrade is required for them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25740 | 1 Nixos | 1 Captive-browser | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| captive browser, a dedicated Chrome instance to log into captive portals without messing with DNS settings. In 25.05 and earlier, when programs.captive-browser is enabled, any user of the system can run arbitrary commands with the CAP_NET_RAW capability (binding to privileged ports, spoofing localhost traffic from privileged services...). This vulnerability is fixed in 25.11 and 26.05. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25715 | 1 Jinan Usr Iot Technology Limited (pusr) | 1 Usr-w610 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The web management interface of the device allows the administrator username and password to be set to blank values. Once applied, the device permits authentication with empty credentials over the web management interface and Telnet service. This effectively disables authentication across all critical management channels, allowing any network-adjacent attacker to gain full administrative control without credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25701 | 1 Opensuse | 1 Sdbootutil | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An Insecure Temporary File vulnerability in openSUSE sdbootutil allows local users to pre-create a directory to achieve various effects like: * gain access to possible private information found in /var/lib/pcrlock.d * manipulate the data backed up in /tmp/pcrlock.d.bak, therefore violating the integrity of the data should it be restored. * overwrite protected system files with data from /var/lib/pcrlock.d by placing symlinks to existing files in the directory tree in /tmp/pcrlock.d.bak. This issue affects sdbootutil: from ? before 5880246d3a02642dc68f5c8cb474bf63cdb56bca. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1058 | 2 10web, Wordpress | 2 Form Maker, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| The Form Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via hidden field values in all versions up to, and including, 1.15.35. This is due to insufficient output escaping when displaying hidden field values in the admin submissions list. The plugin uses html_entity_decode() on user-supplied hidden field values without subsequent escaping before output, which converts HTML entity-encoded payloads back into executable JavaScript. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in the admin submissions view that will execute whenever an administrator accesses the submissions list. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0617 | 2 Latepoint, Wordpress | 2 Latepoint, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the customer profile fields in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever an administrator views the customer's activity history. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9436 | 2 Trustindex, Wordpress | 2 Widgets For Google Reviews, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Widgets for Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `trustindex` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 13.2.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8564 | 3 Elementor, Sonalsinha21, Wordpress | 3 Elementor, Skt Addons For Elementor, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| The SKT Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple widgets in all versions up to, and including, 3.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7748 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in ZCMS 3.6.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Create Article Page. The manipulation of the argument Title leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7040 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| The Cloud SAML SSO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'set_organization_settings' action of the csso_handle_actions() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.19. The handler reads client-supplied POST parameters for organization settings and passes them directly to update_option() without any check of the user’s capabilities or a CSRF nonce. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change critical configuration (including toggling signing and encryption), potentially breaking the SSO flow and causing a denial-of-service. | ||||