| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.0.1 and 6.5.4, the OAuth callback endpoints for Microsoft, Google, and Facebook external credentials do not validate a CSRF state parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.1 and 6.5.4. |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Reflected XSS.
The vulnerability could lead to Reflected XSS attack of cross-site scripting in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X, from 23.0 through 23.X, from 24.0 through 24.X, from 25.1.0 through 25.1.X. |
| Observable response discrepancy vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Password Brute Forcing.
The vulnerability could lead to Password Brute Forcing in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X. |
| Header injection vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
The attacker can take advantage of certain configuration in forward-auth plugin to inject malicious headers.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.12.0 through 3.15.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.16.0, which fixes the issue. |
| Crypt::SecretBuffer versions before 0.019 for Perl is suseceptible to timing attacks.
For example, if Crypt::SecretBuffer was used to store and compare plaintext passwords, then discrepencies in timing could be used to guess the secret password. |
| Rate Limiting for attempting a user login is not being properly enforced, making HCL DevOps Velocity susceptible to brute-force attacks past the unsuccessful login attempt limit. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.1.7. |
| A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing the communication interfaces of the PM 877, CI850 and CI868 modules into fault mode or causing unavailability of the S+ Operations 61850 connectivity, resulting in a denial-of-service situation.
The System 800xA IEC61850 Connect is not affected. Note: This vulnerability does not impact on the overall availability and functionality of the S+ Operations node, only the 61850 communication function.
This issue affects AC800M (System 800xA): from 6.0.0x through 6.0.0303.0, from 6.1.0x through 6.1.0031.0, from 6.1.1x through 6.1.1004.0, from 6.1.1x through 6.1.1202.0, from 6.2.0x through 6.2.0006.0; Symphony Plus SD Series: A_0, A_1, A_2.003, A_3.005, A_4.001, B_0.005; Symphony Plus MR (Melody Rack): from 3.10 through 3.52; S+ Operations: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3. |
| Before Airflow 3.2.0, it was unclear that secure Airflow deployments require the Deployment Manager to take appropriate actions and pay attention to security details and security model of Airflow. Some assumptions the Deployment Manager could make were not clear or explicit enough, even though Airflow's intentions and security model of Airflow did not suggest different assumptions. The overall security model [1], workload isolation [2], and JWT authentication details [3] are now described in more detail. Users concerned with role isolation and following the Airflow security model of Airflow are advised to upgrade to Airflow 3.2, where several security improvements have been implemented. They should also read and follow the relevant documents to make sure that their deployment is secure enough. It also clarifies that the Deployment Manager is ultimately responsible for securing your Airflow deployment. This had also been communicated via Airflow 3.2.0 Blog announcement [4].
[1] Security Model: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/jwt_token_authentication.html
[2] Workload isolation: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/workload.html
[3] JWT Token authentication: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/jwt_token_authentication.html
[4] Airflow 3.2.0 Blog announcement: https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-3.2.0/
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes this issue. |
| Dag Authors, who normally should not be able to execute code in the webserver context could craft XCom payload causing the webserver to execute arbitrary code. Since Dag Authors are already highly trusted, severity of this issue is Low.
Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.2.0, which resolves this issue. |
| Due to an Insecure session management vulnerability in SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform, an unauthenticated attacker could obtain valid session tokens and reuse them to gain unauthorized access to a victim�s session. If the application continues to accept previously issued tokens after authentication, the attacker could assume the victim�s authenticated context. This could allow the attacker to access or modify information within the victim�s session scope, impacting confidentiality and integrity, while availability remains unaffected. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW Secure Access Manager Primary (SAM-P) (All versions < V5.8). User Administrators are allowed to administer groups they belong to. This could allow an authenticated User Administrator to escalate their own privileges and grant themselves access to any device group at any access level. |
| Due to a Code Injection vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Web Dynpro Java), an unauthenticated attacker could supply crafted input that is interpreted by the application and causes it to reference attacker-controlled content. If a victim accesses the affected functionality, that attacker-controlled content could be executed in the victim�s browser, potentially resulting in session compromise. This could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary client-side code, impacting the confidentiality and integrity of the application, with no impact to availability. |
| Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Reference Equipment), an attacker could update and delete child entities via OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
| Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA backend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
| Due to a missing authorization check in SAP Business Analytics and SAP Content Management, an authenticated user could make unauthorized calls to certain remote function modules, potentially accessing sensitive information beyond their intended permissions. This vulnerability affects confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability. |
| Information Disclosure Vulnerability in SAP HANA Cockpit and HANA Database Explorer |
| The Material Master application does not enforce authorization checks for authenticated users when executing reports, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information. This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and does not affect integrity and availability of the system. |
| Due to a missing authorization check, SAP S/4HANA (Private Cloud and On-Premise) allows an authenticated user to delete files on the operating system and gain unauthorized control over file operations which could leads to no impact on Confidentiality, Low impact on Integrity and Availability of the application. |
| SAP Landscape Transformation contains a vulnerability in an RFC-exposed function module that could allow a high privileged adversary to inject arbitrary ABAP code and operating system commands. Due to this, some information could be modified, but the attacker does not have control over kind or degree. This leads to a low impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
| Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA OData Service (Manage Technical Object Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability results in a low impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
