Search

Search Results (346387 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-41342 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 7.3 High
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the remote onboarding component that persists unauthenticated discovery endpoints without explicit trust confirmation. Attackers can spoof discovery endpoints to redirect onboarding toward malicious gateways and capture gateway credentials or traffic.
CVE-2026-41341 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5.4 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a logic error in Discord component interaction routing that misclassifies group direct messages as direct messages in extensions/discord/src/monitor/agent-components-helpers.ts. Attackers can exploit this misclassification to bypass group DM policy enforcement or trigger incorrect session handling.
CVE-2026-41340 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 6.5 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an authentication boundary vulnerability where Telegram legacy allowFrom migration incorrectly fans default-account trust into all named accounts. Attackers can exploit this trust propagation to bypass authentication controls and gain unauthorized access to named accounts.
CVE-2026-41339 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 4.3 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 exposes configPath and stateDir metadata in Gateway connect success snapshots to non-admin authenticated clients. Non-admin clients can recover host-specific filesystem paths and deployment details, enabling host fingerprinting and facilitating chained attacks.
CVE-2026-41338 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a time-of-check-time-of-use vulnerability in sandbox file operations that allows attackers to bypass fd-based defenses. Attackers can exploit check-then-act patterns in apply_patch, remove, and mkdir operations to manipulate files between validation and execution.
CVE-2026-41337 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5.3 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a callback origin mutation vulnerability in Plivo voice-call replay that allows attackers to mutate in-process callback origin before replay rejection. Attackers with captured valid callbacks for live calls can exploit this to manipulate callback origins during the replay process.
CVE-2026-41335 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5.3 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the Control Interface bootstrap JSON that exposes version and assistant agent identifiers. Attackers can extract sensitive fingerprinting information from the Control UI bootstrap payload to identify system versions and agent configurations.
CVE-2026-41334 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 6.5 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a decompression bomb vulnerability in image processing that fails to properly enforce pixel-limit guards on sips. Attackers can exploit this by uploading oversized images to cause denial of service through excessive memory consumption.
CVE-2026-41333 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 3.7 Low
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an authentication rate limiting bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to circumvent shared authentication protections using fake device tokens. Attackers can exploit the mixed WebSocket authentication flow to bypass rate limiting controls and conduct brute force attacks against weak shared passwords.
CVE-2026-41332 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5.3 Medium
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an environment variable sanitization vulnerability where GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR and AWS_CONFIG_FILE are not blocked in the host-env blocklist. Attackers can exploit approved exec requests to redirect git or AWS CLI behavior through attacker-controlled configuration files to execute untrusted code or load malicious credentials.
CVE-2026-41349 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 8.8 High
OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an agentic consent bypass vulnerability allowing LLM agents to silently disable execution approval via config.patch parameter. Remote attackers can exploit this to bypass security controls and execute unauthorized operations without user consent.
CVE-2026-41346 1 Openclaw 1 Openclaw 2026-04-24 5.3 Medium
OpenClaw 2026.2.26 before 2026.3.31 enforces pending pairing-request caps per channel file instead of per account, allowing attackers to exhaust the shared pending window. Remote attackers can submit pairing requests from other accounts to block new pairing challenges on unaffected accounts, causing denial of service.
CVE-2026-40305 1 Dnnsoftware 2 Dnn Platform, Dotnetnuke 2026-04-24 4.3 Medium
DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Starting in version 6.0.0 and prior to version 10.2.2, in the friends feature, a user could craft a request that would force the acceptance of a friend request on another user. Version 10.2.2 patches the issue.
CVE-2026-35064 2026-04-24 7.5 High
A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s management ecosystem allows unauthenticated discovery of deployed units through the vendor’s management protocol, enabling identification of device presence, identifiers, and management interfaces without requiring credentials. Because discovery functions are exposed by the underlying service rather than gated by authentication, an attacker on the same network segment can rapidly enumerate targeted devices.
CVE-2026-35503 2026-04-24 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows authentication logic to be performed entirely on the client side, relying on hardcoded values within browser-executed scripts rather than server-side verification. An attacker with access to the login page could retrieve these exposed parameters and gain unauthorized access to administrative functionality.
CVE-2026-39462 2026-04-24 8.1 High
A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface in which password updates are not reliably applied due to improper handling of credential changes on the backend. After the device undergoes a factory restore using the SenseLive Config 2.0 tool, the interface may indicate that the password update was successful; however, the system may continue to accept the previous or default credentials, demonstrating that the password-change process is not consistently enforced. Even after a factory reset, attempted password changes may fail to propagate correctly.
CVE-2026-40431 2026-04-24 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface due to its reliance on unencrypted HTTP for all administrative communication. Because management traffic, including authentication attempts and configuration data, is transmitted in cleartext, an attacker with access to the same network segment could intercept or observe sensitive operational information.
CVE-2026-40620 2026-04-24 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s embedded management service allows full administrative control to be established without any form of authentication or authorization on the SenseLive config application. The service accepts management connections from any reachable host, enabling unrestricted modification of critical configuration parameters, operational modes, and device state through a vendor-supplied or compatible client.
CVE-2026-40623 2026-04-24 8.1 High
A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050's web management interface allows critical system and network configuration parameters to be modified without sufficient validation and safety controls. Due to inadequate enforcement of constraints on sensitive functions, parameters such as IP addressing, watchdog timers, reconnect intervals, and service ports can be set to unsupported or unsafe values. These configuration changes directly affect core device behaviour and recovery mechanisms. The lack of proper validation and safeguards allows critical system functions to be altered in a manner that can destabilize device operation or render the device persistently unavailable.
CVE-2026-40630 2026-04-24 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability in  SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows unauthorized access to certain configuration endpoints due to improper access control enforcement. An attacker with network access to the device may be able to bypass the intended authentication mechanism and directly interact with sensitive configuration functions.