Search Results (2278 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-22367 1 Ichiranusa 1 Ichiran 2025-03-21 5.9 Medium
Ichiran App for iOS versions prior to 3.1.0 and Ichiran App for Android versions prior to 3.1.0 improperly verify server certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2023-34410 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Qt and 1 more 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Qt and 1 more 2025-03-20 5.3 Medium
An issue was discovered in Qt before 5.15.15, 6.x before 6.2.9, and 6.3.x through 6.5.x before 6.5.2. Certificate validation for TLS does not always consider whether the root of a chain is a configured CA certificate.
CVE-2024-8908 1 Google 1 Chrome 2025-03-20 4.3 Medium
Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 129.0.6668.58 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2024-7981 1 Google 1 Chrome 2025-03-20 4.3 Medium
Inappropriate implementation in Views in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.84 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2023-28452 1 Coredns.io 1 Coredns 2025-03-19 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in CoreDNS through 1.10.1. There is a vulnerability in DNS resolving software, which triggers a resolver to ignore valid responses, thus causing denial of service for normal resolution. In an exploit, the attacker could just forge a response targeting the source port of a vulnerable resolver without the need to guess the correct TXID.
CVE-2024-41107 2 Apache, Apache Software Foundation 2 Cloudstack, Apache Cloudstack 2025-03-19 8.1 High
The CloudStack SAML authentication (disabled by default) does not enforce signature check. In CloudStack environments where SAML authentication is enabled, an attacker that initiates CloudStack SAML single sign-on authentication can bypass SAML authentication by submitting a spoofed SAML response with no signature and known or guessed username and other user details of a SAML-enabled CloudStack user-account. In such environments, this can result in a complete compromise of the resources owned and/or accessible by a SAML enabled user-account. Affected users are recommended to disable the SAML authentication plugin by setting the "saml2.enabled" global setting to "false", or upgrade to version 4.18.2.2, 4.19.1.0 or later, which addresses this issue.
CVE-2024-8399 1 Mozilla 1 Firefox Focus 2025-03-19 4.7 Medium
Websites could utilize Javascript links to spoof URL addresses in the Focus navigation bar This vulnerability affects Focus for iOS < 130.
CVE-2024-29171 1 Dell 1 Bsafe Ssl-j 2025-03-19 5.9 Medium
Dell BSAFE SSL-J, versions prior to 6.6 and versions 7.0 through 7.2, contains an Improper certificate verification vulnerability. A remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.
CVE-2024-41256 1 Filestash 1 Filestash 2025-03-18 5.9 Medium
Default configurations in the ShareProofVerifier function of filestash v0.4 causes the application to skip the TLS certificate verification process when sending out email verification codes, possibly allowing attackers to access sensitive data via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2023-49250 1 Apache 1 Dolphinscheduler 2025-03-18 7.3 High
Because the HttpUtils class did not verify certificates, an attacker that could perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack on outgoing https connections could impersonate the server. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.2.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.1, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2022-4550 1 User Activity Project 1 User Activity 2025-03-18 7.5 High
The User Activity WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 checks headers such as the X-Forwarded-For to retrieve the IP address of the request, which could lead to IP spoofing
CVE-2022-27890 1 Palantir 1 Atlasdb 2025-03-18 6.3 Medium
It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.
CVE-2022-48306 1 Palantir 1 Gotham Chat Irc 2025-03-18 5.7 Medium
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Gotham Chat IRC helper of Palantir Gotham allows A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. This issue affects: Palantir Palantir Gotham Chat IRC helper versions prior to 30221005.210011.9242.
CVE-2022-48307 1 Palantir 1 Magritte-ftp 2025-03-18 6.3 Medium
It was discovered that the Magritte-ftp was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of a successful man in the middle attack on magritte-ftp, an attacker would be able to read and modify network traffic such as authentication tokens or raw data entering a Palantir Foundry stack.
CVE-2022-48308 1 Palantir 1 Sls-logging 2025-03-18 6.3 Medium
It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service.
CVE-2024-39081 1 Jktyre 1 Smart Tyre Car \& Bike 2025-03-17 4.2 Medium
An issue in SMART TYRE CAR & BIKE v4.2.0 allows attackers to perform a man-in-the-middle attack via Bluetooth communications.
CVE-2024-32928 2 Google, Haxx 3 Nest Mini, Nest Mini Firmware, Libcurl 2025-03-14 5.9 Medium
The libcurl CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER option was disabled on a subset of requests made by Nest production devices which enabled a potential man-in-the-middle attack on requests to Google cloud services by any host the traffic was routed through.
CVE-2024-45159 1 Arm 1 Mbed Tls 2025-03-13 9.8 Critical
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).
CVE-2024-41258 1 Filestash 1 Filestash 2025-03-13 5.3 Medium
An issue was discovered in filestash v0.4. The usage of the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() disables host key verification, possibly allowing attackers to obtain sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2023-20025 1 Cisco 8 Rv016, Rv016 Firmware, Rv042 and 5 more 2025-03-12 9 Critical
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV016, RV042, RV042G, and RV082 Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user input within incoming HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain root access on the underlying operating system.