Export limit exceeded: 10813 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10813 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1000089 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Builds in Jenkins are associated with an authentication that controls the permissions that the build has to interact with other elements in Jenkins. The Pipeline: Build Step Plugin did not check the build authentication it was running as and allowed triggering any other project in Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000071 | 1 Apereo | 1 Phpcas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Jasig phpCAS version 1.3.4 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass in the validateCAS20 function when configured to authenticate against an old CAS server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000068 | 1 Betterment | 1 Testtrack | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| TestTrack Server versions 1.0 and earlier are vulnerable to an authentication flaw in the split disablement feature resulting in the ability to disable arbitrary running splits and cause denial of service to clients in the field. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000056 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Kubernetes version 1.5.0-1.5.4 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation in the PodSecurityPolicy admission plugin resulting in the ability to make use of any existing PodSecurityPolicy object. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000030 | 1 Oracle | 1 Glassfish Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Oracle, GlassFish Server Open Source Edition 3.0.1 (build 22) is vulnerable to Java Key Store Password Disclosure vulnerability, that makes it possible to provide an unauthenticated attacker plain text password of administrative user and grant access to the web-based administration interface. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000020 | 3 Ecos, Greatek, Totolink | 3 Embedded Web Servers, Soho, Soho | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SYN Flood or FIN Flood attack in ECos 1 and other versions embedded devices results in web Authentication Bypass. "eCos Embedded Web Servers used by Multiple Routers and Home devices, while sending SYN Flood or FIN Flood packets fails to validate and handle the packets and does not ask for any sign of authentication resulting in Authentication Bypass. An attacker can take complete advantage of this bug and take over the device remotely or locally. The bug has been successfully tested and reproduced in some versions of SOHO Routers manufactured by TOTOLINK, GREATEK and others." | ||||
| CVE-2017-0910 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Zulip Server before 1.7.1, on a server with multiple realms, a vulnerability in the invitation system lets an authorized user of one realm on the server create a user account on any other realm. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9956 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Flightgear | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Flightgear | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The route manager in FlightGear before 2016.4.4 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted Nasal script. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9818 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Xen through 4.7.x allows local ARM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host crash) via vectors involving an asynchronous abort while at HYP. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9817 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Xen through 4.7.x allows local ARM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host crash) via vectors involving a (1) data or (2) prefetch abort with the ESR_EL2.EA bit set. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9816 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Xen through 4.7.x allows local ARM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host crash) via vectors involving an asynchronous abort while at EL2. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9815 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Xen through 4.7.x allows local ARM guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host panic) by sending an asynchronous abort. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9729 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM QRadar 7.2 does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonymous users access to protected areas. IBM Reference #: 1999545. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9122 | 1 Go-jose Project | 1 Go-jose | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9016 | 1 Firejail Project | 1 Firejail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Firejail 0.9.38.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary commands outside of the sandbox via a crafted TIOCSTI ioctl call. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9008 | 1 Ibm | 1 Urbancode Deploy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM UrbanCode Deploy could allow a malicious user to access the Agent Relay ActiveMQ Broker JMX interface and run plugins on the agent. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8986 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Mq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM WebSphere MQ 8.0 could allow an authenticated user with access to the queue manager to bring down MQ channels using specially crafted HTTP requests. IBM Reference #: 1998648. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8951 | 1 Ibm | 1 Emptoris Strategic Supply Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. An attacker can exploit a vulnerability in the authentication features that could log out users and flood user accounts with emails. IBM X-Force ID: 118838. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8942 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Control, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center could allow an authenticated user with intimate knowledge of the system to edit a limited set of properties on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8938 | 1 Ibm | 1 Urbancode Deploy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM UrbanCode Deploy could allow a user to execute code using a specially crafted file upload that would replace code on the server. This code could be executed on the UCD agent machines that host customer's production applications. | ||||