Export limit exceeded: 340709 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (340709 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-4395 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-03-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the KCAPI ECC code path of wc_ecc_import_x963_ex() in wolfSSL wolfcrypt allows a remote attacker to write attacker-controlled data past the bounds of the pubkey_raw buffer via a crafted oversized EC public key point. The WOLFSSL_KCAPI_ECC code path copies the input to key->pubkey_raw (132 bytes) using XMEMCPY without a bounds check, unlike the ATECC code path which includes a length validation. This can be triggered during TLS key exchange when a malicious peer sends a crafted ECPoint in ServerKeyExchange. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33732 | 2026-03-26 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| srvx is a universal server based on web standards. Prior to version 0.11.13, a pathname parsing discrepancy in srvx's `FastURL` allows middleware bypass on the Node.js adapter when a raw HTTP request uses an absolute URI with a non-standard scheme (e.g. `file://`). Starting in version 0.11.13, the `FastURL` constructor now deopts to native `URL` for any string not starting with `/`, ensuring consistent pathname resolution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33634 | 1 Aquasecurity | 3 Setup-trivy, Trivy, Trivy-action | 2026-03-26 | N/A |
| Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in `aquasecurity/trivy-action` to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in `aquasecurity/setup-trivy` with malicious commits. This incident is a continuation of the supply chain attack that began in late February 2026. Following the initial disclosure on March 1, credential rotation was performed but was not atomic (not all credentials were revoked simultaneously). The attacker could have use a valid token to exfiltrate newly rotated secrets during the rotation window (which lasted a few days). This could have allowed the attacker to retain access and execute the March 19 attack. Affected components include the `aquasecurity/trivy` Go / Container image version 0.69.4, the `aquasecurity/trivy-action` GitHub Action versions 0.0.1 – 0.34.2 (76/77), and the`aquasecurity/setup-trivy` GitHub Action versions 0.2.0 – 0.2.6, prior to the recreation of 0.2.6 with a safe commit. Known safe versions include versions 0.69.2 and 0.69.3 of the Trivy binary, version 0.35.0 of trivy-action, and version 0.2.6 of setup-trivy. Additionally, take other mitigations to ensure the safety of secrets. If there is any possibility that a compromised version ran in one's environment, all secrets accessible to affected pipelines must be treated as exposed and rotated immediately. Check whether one's organization pulled or executed Trivy v0.69.4 from any source. Remove any affected artifacts immediately. Review all workflows using `aquasecurity/trivy-action` or `aquasecurity/setup-trivy`. Those who referenced a version tag rather than a full commit SHA should check workflow run logs from March 19–20, 2026 for signs of compromise. Look for repositories named `tpcp-docs` in one's GitHub organization. The presence of such a repository may indicate that the fallback exfiltration mechanism was triggered and secrets were successfully stolen. Pin GitHub Actions to full, immutable commit SHA hashes, don't use mutable version tags. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33504 | 2026-03-26 | 7.2 High | ||
| Ory Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 Server and OpenID Connect Provider. Prior to version 26.2.0, the listOAuth2Clients, listOAuth2ConsentSessions, and listTrustedOAuth2JwtGrantIssuers Admin APIs in Ory Hydra are vulnerable to SQL injection due to flaws in its pagination implementation. Pagination tokens are encrypted using the secret configured in `secrets.pagination`. If this value is not set, Hydra falls back to using `secrets.system`. An attacker who knows this secret can craft their own tokens, including malicious tokens that lead to SQL injection. This issue can be exploited when one or more admin APIs listed above are directly or indirectly accessible to the attacker; the attacker can pass a raw pagination token to the affected API; and the configuration value `secrets.pagination` is set and known to the attacker, or `secrets.pagination` is not set and `secrets.system` is known to the attacker. An attacker can execute arbitrary SQL queries through forged pagination tokens. As a first line of defense, immediately configure a custom value for `secrets.pagination` by generating a cryptographically secure random secret. Next, upgrade Hydra to the fixed version, 26.2.0 as soon as possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33496 | 2026-03-26 | 8.1 High | ||
| ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to authentication bypass due to cache key confusion. The `oauth2_introspection` authenticator cache does not distinguish tokens that were validated with different introspection URLs. An attacker can therefore legitimately use a token to prime the cache, and subsequently use the same token for rules that use a different introspection server. Ory Oathkeeper has to be configured with multiple `oauth2_introspection` authenticator servers, each accepting different tokens. The authenticators also must be configured to use caching. An attacker has to have a way to gain a valid token for one of the configured introspection servers. Starting in version 26.2.0, Ory Oathkeeper includes the introspection server URL in the cache key, preventing confusion of tokens. Update to the patched version of Ory Oathkeeper. If that is not immediately possible, disable caching for `oauth2_introspection` authenticators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33495 | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Ory Oathkeeper is often deployed behind other components like CDNs, WAFs, or reverse proxies. Depending on the setup, another component might forward the request to the Oathkeeper proxy with a different protocol (http vs. https) than the original request. In order to properly match the request against the configured rules, Oathkeeper considers the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header when evaluating rules. The configuration option `serve.proxy.trust_forwarded_headers` (defaults to false) governs whether this and other `X-Forwarded-*` headers should be trusted. Prior to version 26.2.0, Oathkeeper did not properly respect this configuration, and would always consider the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header. In order for an attacker to abuse this, an installation of Ory Oathkeeper needs to have distinct rules for HTTP and HTTPS requests. Also, the attacker needs to be able to trigger one but not the other rule. In this scenario, the attacker can send the same request but with the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header in order to trigger the other rule. We do not expect many configurations to meet these preconditions. Version 26.2.0 contains a patch. Ory Oathkeeper will correctly respect the `serve.proxy.trust_forwarded_headers` configuration going forward, thereby eliminating the attack scenario. We recommend upgrading to a fixed version even if the preconditions are not met. As an additional mitigation, it is generally recommended to drop any unexpected headers as early as possible when a request is handled, e.g. in the WAF. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33494 | 2026-03-26 | 10 Critical | ||
| ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Versions prior to 26.2.0 are vulnerable to an authorization bypass via HTTP path traversal. An attacker can craft a URL containing path traversal sequences (e.g. `/public/../admin/secrets`) that resolves to a protected path after normalization, but is matched against a permissive rule because the raw, un-normalized path is used during rule evaluation. Version 26.2.0 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33487 | 2026-03-26 | 7.5 High | ||
| goxmlsig provides XML Digital Signatures implemented in Go. Prior to version 1.6.0, the `validateSignature` function in `validate.go` goes through the references in the `SignedInfo` block to find one that matches the signed element's ID. In Go versions before 1.22, or when `go.mod` uses an older version, there is a loop variable capture issue. The code takes the address of the loop variable `_ref` instead of its value. As a result, if more than one reference matches the ID or if the loop logic is incorrect, the `ref` pointer will always end up pointing to the last element in the `SignedInfo.References` slice after the loop. goxmlsig version 1.6.0 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33486 | 2026-03-26 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Roadiz is a polymorphic content management system based on a node system that can handle many types of services. A vulnerability in roadiz/documents prior to versions 2.7.9, 2.6.28, 2.5.44, and 2.3.42 allows an authenticated attacker to read any file on the server's local file system that the web server process has access to, including highly sensitive environment variables, database credentials, and internal configuration files. Versions 2.7.9, 2.6.28, 2.5.44, and 2.3.42 contain a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33481 | 2026-03-26 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Syft is a a CLI tool and Go library for generating a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) from container images and filesystems. Syft versions before v1.42.3 would not properly cleanup temporary storage if the temporary storage was exhausted during a scan. When scanning archives Syft will unpack those archives into temporary storage then inspect the unpacked contents. Under normal operation Syft will remove the temporary data it writes after completing a scan. This vulnerability would affect users of Syft that were scanning content that could cause Syft to fill the temporary storage that would then cause Syft to raise an error and exit. When the error is triggered Syft would exit without properly removing the temporary files in use. In our testing this was most easily reproduced by scanning very large artifacts or highly compressed artifacts such as a zipbomb. Because Syft would not clean up its temporary files, the result would be filling temporary file storage preventing future runs of Syft or other system utilities that rely on temporary storage being available. The patch has been released in v1.42.3. Syft now cleans up temporary files when an error condition is encountered. There are no workarounds for this vulnerability in Syft. Users that find their temporary storage depleted can manually remove the temporary files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33470 | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Frigate is a network video recorder (NVR) with realtime local object detection for IP cameras. In version 0.17.0, a low-privilege authenticated user restricted to one camera can access snapshots from other cameras. This is possible through a chain of two authorization problems: `/api/timeline` returns timeline entries for cameras outside the caller's allowed camera set, then `/api/events/{event_id}/snapshot-clean.webp` declares `Depends(require_camera_access)` but never actually validates `event.camera` after looking up the event. Together, this allows a restricted user to enumerate event IDs from unauthorized cameras and then fetch clean snapshots for those events. Version 0.17.1 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33438 | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Stirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files. Versions starting in 2.1.5 and prior to 2.5.2 have Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the Stirling-PDF watermark functionality (`/api/v1/security/add-watermark` endpoint). The vulnerability allows authenticated users to cause resource exhaustion and server crashes by providing extreme values for the `fontSize` and `widthSpacer` parameters. Version 2.5.2 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33015 | 2026-03-26 | 5.2 Medium | ||
| EVerest is an EV charging software stack. Prior to version 2026.02.0, even immediately after CSMS performs a RemoteStop (StopTransaction), the EVSE can return to `PrepareCharging` via the EV's BCB toggle, allowing session restart. This breaks the irreversibility of remote stop and can bypass operational/billing/safety controls. Version 2026.02.0 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32857 | 2026-03-26 | N/A | ||
| Firecrawl version 2.8.0 and prior contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the Playwright scraping service where network policy validation is applied only to the initial user-supplied URL and not to subsequent redirect destinations. Attackers can supply an externally valid URL that passes validation and returns an HTTP redirect to an internal or restricted resource, allowing the browser to follow the redirect and fetch the final destination without revalidation, thereby gaining access to internal network services and sensitive endpoints. This issue is distinct from CVE-2024-56800, which describes redirect-based SSRF generally. This vulnerability specifically arises from a post-redirect enforcement gap in implemented SSRF protections, where validation is applied only to the initial request and not to the final redirected destination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25357 | 2 Azzaroco, Wordpress | 2 Ultimate Membership Pro, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 8.1 High |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in azzaroco Ultimate Membership Pro indeed-membership-pro allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Ultimate Membership Pro: from n/a through <= 13.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25344 | 2 Radiustheme, Wordpress | 2 Review Schema, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in RadiusTheme Review Schema review-schema allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Review Schema: from n/a through <= 2.2.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25339 | 2 Syed Balkhi, Wordpress | 2 Contact Form By Wpforms, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Contact Form by WPForms wpforms-lite allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Contact Form by WPForms: from n/a through <= 1.9.8.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25328 | 2 Add-ons.org, Wordpress | 2 Product File Upload For Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 6.8 Medium |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in add-ons.org Product File Upload for WooCommerce products-file-upload-for-woocommerce allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Product File Upload for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 2.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25035 | 2 Wasiliy Strecker / Contestgallery Developer, Wordpress | 2 Contest Gallery, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Wasiliy Strecker / ContestGallery developer Contest Gallery contest-gallery allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Contest Gallery: from n/a through <= 28.1.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25017 | 2 Stmcan, Wordpress | 2 Naturalife Extensions, Wordpress | 2026-03-26 | 8.1 High |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in stmcan NaturaLife Extensions naturalife-extensions allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects NaturaLife Extensions: from n/a through <= 2.1. | ||||