Export limit exceeded: 21423 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (21423 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11576 | 2 Newcodebyte, Wordpress | 2 Ai Chatbot Free Models, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The AI Chatbot Free Models – Customer Support, Live Chat, Virtual Assistant plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to CSV Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.5. This is due to insufficient sanitization in the 'newcodebyte_chatbot_export_messages' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to embed untrusted input into exported CSV files, which can result in code execution when these files are downloaded and opened on a local system with a vulnerable configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24823 | 1 Fastshift | 1 X-track | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in FASTSHIFT X-TRACK (Software/X-Track/USER/App/Utils/lv_img_png/PNGdec/src modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files inflate.C. This issue affects X-TRACK: through v2.7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1848 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow, Memory Corruption, Out-Of-Bounds Read, Out-Of-Bounds Write, Stack-based Buffer Overflow, Type Confusion, Uninitialized Variable, Use-After-Free vulnerabilities exist in the file reading procedure in SOLIDWORKS Desktop on Release SOLIDWORKS 2024. These vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code while opening a specially crafted CATPART, DWG, DXF, IPT, JT, SAT, SLDDRW, SLDPRT, STL, STP, X_B or X_T file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5535 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 7 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33270 | 1 Prestashop | 1 Prestashop | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in FME Modules fileuploads v.2.0.3 and before and fixed in v2.0.4 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the uploadfiles.php component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4440 | 1 H3c | 1 Gr-1800ax | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in H3C GR-1800AX up to 100R008 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function EnableIpv6 of the file /goform/aspForm. The manipulation of the argument param leads to buffer overflow. Access to the local network is required for this attack to succeed. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37149 | 1 Hpe | 1 Proliant Rl300 Gen11 | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| A potential out-of-bound reads vulnerability in HPE ProLiant RL300 Gen11 Server's UEFI firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7844 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolftpm | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Exporting a TPM based RSA key larger than 2048 bits from the TPM could overrun a stack buffer if the default `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS=2048` is used. If your TPM 2.0 module supports RSA key sizes larger than 2048 bit and your applications supports creating or importing an RSA private or public key larger than 2048 bits and your application calls `wolfTPM2_RsaKey_TpmToWolf` on that key, then a stack buffer could be overrun. If the `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS` build-time macro is set correctly (RSA bits match what TPM hardware is capable of) for the hardware target, then a stack overrun is not possible. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5403 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Experion Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Server hostname translation to IP address manipulation which could lead to an attacker performing remote code execution or causing a failure. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20204 | 1 Dbltek | 1 Goip | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| DBLTek GoIP devices (models GoIP 1, 4, 8, 16, and 32) contain an undocumented vendor backdoor in the Telnet administrative interface that allows remote authentication as an undocumented user via a proprietary challenge–response scheme which is fundamentally flawed. Because the challenge response can be computed from the challenge itself, a remote attacker can authenticate without knowledge of a secret and obtain a root shell on the device. This can lead to persistent remote code execution, full device compromise, and arbitrary control of the device and any managed services. The firmware used within these devices was updated in December 2016 to make this vulnerability more complex to exploit. However, it is unknown if DBLTek has taken steps to fully mitigate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9102 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| phpLDAPadmin since at least version 1.2.0 through the latest version 1.2.6.7 allows users to export elements from the LDAP directory into a Comma-Separated Value (CSV) file, but it does not neutralize special elements that could be interpreted as a command when the file is opened by a spreadsheet product. Thus, this could lead to CSV Formula Injection. NOTE: This vulnerability will not be addressed, the maintainer's position is that it is not the intention of phpLDAPadmin to control what data Administrators can put in their LDAP database, nor filter it on export. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37050 | 1 M.j.m | 1 Quick Player | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Quick Player 1.3 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting a malicious .m3l file with carefully constructed payload. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by loading a specially crafted file through the application's file loading mechanism, potentially enabling remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55050 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| CWE-1242: Inclusion of Undocumented Features | ||||
| CVE-2025-8556 | 1 Redhat | 23 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ceph Storage and 20 more | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in CIRCL's implementation of the FourQ elliptic curve. This vulnerability allows an attacker to compromise session security via low-order point injection and incorrect point validation during Diffie-Hellman key exchange. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41100 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect authentication vulnerability in ParkingDoor. Through this vulnerability it is possible to operate the device without the access being logged in the application and even if the access permissions have been revoked. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12183 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37202 | 1 Nsasoft | 1 Nsauditor Networksleuth | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| NetworkSleuth 3.0.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by supplying an oversized registration key. Attackers can generate a 1000-character buffer payload and paste it into the registration key field to trigger an application crash. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12212 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| The vulnerability occurs in the parsing of CSP files. The issues result from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which could allow reading past the end of allocated data structures, resulting in execution of arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29476 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in compress_chunk_fuzzer with oss-fuzz on commit 16450518afddcb3139de627157208e49bfef6987 in c-blosc2 v.2.17.0 and before. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52534 | 1 Amd | 1 Epyc 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper bound check within AMD CPU microcode can allow a malicious guest to write to host memory, potentially resulting in loss of integrity. | ||||