Export limit exceeded: 346551 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (346551 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41341 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a logic error in Discord component interaction routing that misclassifies group direct messages as direct messages in extensions/discord/src/monitor/agent-components-helpers.ts. Attackers can exploit this misclassification to bypass group DM policy enforcement or trigger incorrect session handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41342 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.3 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the remote onboarding component that persists unauthenticated discovery endpoints without explicit trust confirmation. Attackers can spoof discovery endpoints to redirect onboarding toward malicious gateways and capture gateway credentials or traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41344 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the chat.send endpoint that allows write-scoped gateway callers to persist admin-only verboseLevel session overrides. Attackers can exploit the /verbose parameter to bypass access controls and expose sensitive reasoning or tool output intended to be restricted to administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41345 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a credential exposure vulnerability in media download functionality that forwards Authorization headers across cross-origin redirects. Attackers can exploit this by crafting malicious cross-origin redirect chains to intercept sensitive authorization credentials intended for legitimate requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41347 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 lacks browser-origin validation in HTTP operator endpoints when operating in trusted-proxy mode, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious requests from a browser in trusted-proxy deployments to perform unauthorized actions on HTTP operator endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41348 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Discord slash command and autocomplete paths that fail to enforce group DM channel allowlist restrictions. Authorized Discord users can bypass channel restrictions by invoking slash commands, allowing access to restricted group DM channels. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41350 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a session visibility bypass vulnerability where the session_status function fails to enforce configured tools.sessions.visibility restrictions for unsandboxed invocations. Attackers can invoke session_status without sandbox constraints to bypass session-policy controls and access restricted session information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41351 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a replay detection bypass vulnerability in webhook signature handling that treats Base64 and Base64URL encoded signatures as distinct requests. Attackers can re-encode Telnyx webhook signatures to bypass replay detection while maintaining valid signature verification. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41353 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 8.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.22 contains an access control bypass vulnerability in the allowProfiles feature that allows attackers to circumvent profile restrictions through persistent profile mutation and runtime profile selection. Remote attackers can exploit this by manipulating browser proxy profiles at runtime to access restricted profiles and bypass intended access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41354 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 3.7 Low |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an insufficient scope vulnerability in Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys that allows legitimate events from different conversations or senders to collide. Attackers can exploit weak deduplication scoping to cause silent message suppression and disrupt bot workflows across chat sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41356 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 fails to terminate active WebSocket sessions when rotating device tokens. Attackers with previously compromised credentials can maintain unauthorized access through existing WebSocket connections after token rotation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41357 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 3.3 Low |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an environment variable leakage vulnerability in SSH-based sandbox backends that pass unsanitized process.env to child processes. Attackers can exploit this by leveraging non-default SSH environment forwarding configurations to leak sensitive environment variables from parent processes to SSH child processes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41359 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability allowing authenticated operators with write permissions to access admin-class Telegram configuration and cron persistence settings via the send endpoint. Attackers with operator.write credentials can exploit insufficient access controls to reach sensitive administrative functionality and modify persistence mechanisms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41360 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.4.2 contains an approval integrity vulnerability in pnpm dlx that fails to bind local script operands consistently with pnpm exec flows. Attackers can replace approved local scripts before execution without invalidating the approval plan, allowing execution of modified script contents. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41361 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.1 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an SSRF guard bypass vulnerability that fails to block four IPv6 special-use ranges. Attackers can exploit this by crafting URLs targeting internal or non-routable IPv6 addresses to bypass SSRF protections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41336 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-24 | 7.8 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 allows workspace .env files to override the OPENCLAW_BUNDLED_HOOKS_DIR environment variable, enabling loading of attacker-controlled hook code. Attackers can replace trusted default-on bundled hooks from untrusted workspaces to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40305 | 1 Dnnsoftware | 2 Dnn Platform, Dotnetnuke | 2026-04-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Starting in version 6.0.0 and prior to version 10.2.2, in the friends feature, a user could craft a request that would force the acceptance of a friend request on another user. Version 10.2.2 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35064 | 2026-04-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s management ecosystem allows unauthenticated discovery of deployed units through the vendor’s management protocol, enabling identification of device presence, identifiers, and management interfaces without requiring credentials. Because discovery functions are exposed by the underlying service rather than gated by authentication, an attacker on the same network segment can rapidly enumerate targeted devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35503 | 2026-04-24 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface allows authentication logic to be performed entirely on the client side, relying on hardcoded values within browser-executed scripts rather than server-side verification. An attacker with access to the login page could retrieve these exposed parameters and gain unauthorized access to administrative functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39462 | 2026-04-24 | 8.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability exists in SenseLive X3050’s web management interface in which password updates are not reliably applied due to improper handling of credential changes on the backend. After the device undergoes a factory restore using the SenseLive Config 2.0 tool, the interface may indicate that the password update was successful; however, the system may continue to accept the previous or default credentials, demonstrating that the password-change process is not consistently enforced. Even after a factory reset, attempted password changes may fail to propagate correctly. | ||||